جلد
شمارہ
مقالے کی قسم
زبان


تلخیص
This paper revisits the trial of Socrates which is considered to be a landmark in the history of Western Political and Legal thought. It is at the source of our various political as well as moral conceptions. On the other hand, the Eichmann Trial put an end to discrimination on the basis of race and religion despite the various legal inconsistencies in it. Much has been written covering a range of topics and multiple topics related to both these historically important and game changing trials. The present paper, however, is an effort to reinterpret various Socratic arguments presented in Plato’s Crito related to the problem of ‘citizen in obedience’. The authors have intended to accomplish this task with the help of ‘the Eichmann Trial’. The attempts have been directed at highlighting the possible discrepancies in Socratic arguments in the dialogue concerning the matter at hand.

Dr Shagufta Begum, Hafiz Muhammad Hammad Mushtaq. (2018) THE DILEMMA OF UNLIMITED OBEDIENCE TO LAWS: A RECONSIDERATION OF SOCRATIC TRIAL IN THE LIGHT OF EICHMANN TRIAL, Al-Hikmat: A Journal of Philosophy, Volume 38, Issue 1.
  • Views 802
  • Downloads 37