Abstract
If a poet, specifically speaking follows the direction of romanticism and
his creation becomes an artistic piece. In this paper “artistic” means to
suppose novelty, contingency, spontaneity, self-creation, contradictory
and probably consistency in art. This cerebration involves his art into the
modern art. I suppose Gul Khan Nasir’s social mode as a romantic task
which makes empathy possible. When man empathizes anything on
intellect plan, then his expressions come from his self.’ Thus self always
supposes novelty, contingency, spontaneity, self-creation, contradictory
and probably consistent. (Tahir and Amin)This cerebration makes Gul a
modern poet. In this paper I focus on the sources of modernity of Gul’s
poetry, because modern philosophy is based on epistemological inquiry.
In which the source of knowledge is primary than other things. In this
paper further I entertain the discourse of “source” through Gadamer’s
philosophy which argues language is not something that could be
conducted by man. In first portion I discuss analytically Gul Khan’s
artistic mode with Gadamer’s philosophy, and count the importance of
debate. In second position I make a debate on Gadamer’s philosophy,
finally in third portion I try to analyze entire cerebration or debate to
conclude it with the debate of “conducted beauty”.
Muhammad Amin, Shazia Jaffar, Yousaf Rodini. (2017) The Critique of Modern Beauty in Balochi Poetry In the Study of Gul Khan’s Poetry, Pakistan Studies, Volume 7, Issue 1.
-
Views
677 -
Downloads
127
