Abstract
While broadly speaking the framework of separation of power is not fully executed which has
caused institutional tangle in the history of Pakistan, however, the main objective of this research
paper is to re-investigate the relationship between the civil and military leadership in the period
2013-2018. The elemental premise of this article is that the civilian and military leadership has
generally squabbled during the civilian rule. This paper contends that this wrangle has left a
majority of people of Pakistan with undelivered promises and their woes have generally
multiplied. Generally speaking, perception abounds that form over substance approach
proliferates in the present democratic set-up. There is an impression that the military schemes
surreptitiously to destabilize the civil governments if the latter does not play to the whims of the
former. The relations between the two power-centres embittered during the period 2013-2018 and
it is generally believed that such tensions led to events like the dharna (sit – in) by the PTI/PAT,
Tehreek-i-Labbayak protests/sit-ins and the disputed election results of 2018. Right or wrong, but
there is an impression that military has generally tried to transgress its limits and meddled in the
affairs of the civil administration in order to punish the ‘corrupt civilians’ for their corrupt
practices. The relationship of civilian and military leadership in this article discusses specifically
the instances which created tussles between both the leadership during the 2013-2018 periods.
Again, the civilian leadership is facing the charges of corruption and since the matter is subjudice, this paper constraints from considering these politicians corrupt or innocent but the main
argument of the paper is that whether it is direct or indirect military interference the main
allegation against the politicians is corruption. Therefore, this paper will try to find the answer to
the following queries: what is the conduct of the civil governments how the civilians irritate the
military and other institutions why the military takes interest into the civilian matters and why
military needs to policing the civil governments and what factors caused the downfall of Mian
Nawaz Sharif government. The underlying hypothesis of the study is that the theory of separation
of power is not fully implemented in Pakistan which has been causing institutional clash and
powerful institutions overpower the weaker and in case of Pakistan’s parliament is the weakest
institution. However, this paper will like to recommend to go for the basics of democracy
‘Separation of power’ to ensure continuation and consolidation of democracy.
Zahid Mahmood , Muhammad Iqbal Chawla. (2020) Theory of Separation of Power: Balancing the CivilMilitary Relations in Pakistan 2013-2018, South Asian Studies, Volume 35, Issue 1.
-
Views
1002 -
Downloads
101
