Abstract
Review is an important step in any scientific process. It is considered as a standardized way for the publication of authentic scientific information. To be a good author it is mandatory to become a part in reviewing process. The learning of medical writing can be augmented through reviewing process. Although it is a volunteer duty, it certainly improves and sharpens the reviewing skill which is a prime step towards bright medical career. It helps to get state of the art knowledge and better understanding of scientific writing. The peer review process can lead to better and more transparent reporting of clinical science as well as to furnish an impartial and unprejudiced critical assessment.
When an article is received for processing in a journal, the editorial review used to be the first step. The editor completes this job in 2-3 weeks’ time. After that editors will send the manuscript to two or more reviewers for the review. The reviewers for a specific article are selected on the basis of their proficiency and availability. 1Upon acceptance of review invitation, full text manuscript files can be shared via online journal management systems. The reviewers are requested to forward their comments within 2 to 4 weeks of their review acceptance date. Salient feature for reviewing includes complete reading of a manuscript to have an overall idea of the paper. This should be followed by critical appraisal, focusing on the following key points:1,2
Muhammad Jamalullah. (2021) Review process and responsibilities of reviewers, Isra Medical Journal, Volume 13, Issue 03.
-
Views
687 -
Downloads
84
Article Details
Journal
Volume
Issue
Type
Language
Received At
Accepted At
