Abstract
Let me begin with the oft-repeated statement that the worst kind of democracy is better than the most benign dictatorial rule. No one in the right frame of mind can disagree with this assertion. However, in order to comprehend the system of democracy, one has to dig deep into its intent, purpose and essence. Democracy defined in its simplest form means, Government of the people, for the people, and by the people. This definition implies that people are the major stakeholders in decision making and all issues of national importance are decided in accordance with their wishes and aspirations. People send their representatives to the Parliament where they are truly represented without any bias or prejudice or personal considerations. While the parliamentarians are expected to reinforce their party line or ideology, they are under oath not to follow their party dictates which are either against the national interests or flout the basic essence of the constitution. Parliament is a supreme institution which is sovereign and creates congenial environment for the Government to run its business. This places on the Parliament a huge responsibility of keeping the Government on its right course, extending help where necessary and checkmating any policy that could adversely impact on national interests. The representatives, therefore, are supposed to be honest, selfless and true custodians of national interests. They owe allegiance to the State and not to their respective Party high command, and must therefore consider themselves bound by their conscience to contribute in the best interest of the nation
Inam-ul-Haq. (2008) The Dividends of Democracy, The Dialogue, Volume 3, Issue 4.
-
Views
355 -
Downloads
32
